Method and system for providing indexing and cataloguing of orthodontic related treatment profiles and options

ABSTRACT

Method and system for providing an orthodontic profile indexing and treatment plan including comparing an initial patient condition in each of a plurality of dentition categories with one or more reference conditions in each of the plurality of dentition categories, wherein each of the one or more reference conditions has a corresponding representation, selecting at least one reference condition in one or more of the plurality of dentition categories, where each selected reference condition is similar to the initial patient condition in a same dentition category, and generating a patient identifier based on the corresponding representations of each selected reference condition is provided.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is related generally to the field of orthodontics.More specifically, the present invention is related to methods andsystem for providing indexing orthodontic related treatment profiles andoptions.

BACKGROUND

A primary objective of orthodontics is to realign patients' teeth topositions where the teeth function optimally and have an aestheticappearance. The goal of a doctor is to take the patient from theircurrent condition (“initial” or “starting dentition”) to a finalcondition (“treatment goal”). The result achieved is known as the“treatment outcome.” There may be many ways to achieve the goal andthese are known as “treatment options.” The methodologies used by thedoctor to get the patient to the goal are the known as the “treatmentplan.”

Often times, doctors establish the goal as “ideal” and discontinuetreatment when they are as close as they can possibly get to the ideal.However, more recently with the growing use of 3-D computer graphicssoftware services and programs in dentistry, the doctor can actuallyestablish a custom treatment goal specific to each individual patient,and this goal may be a limited treatment goal and not ideal in everycomponent of the bite. This is important because if the doctor is ableto achieve 100% of the intended limited goal, the treatment may still bedeemed a success, whereas it may be possible that if the doctor onlyachieves 75% of a completely “ideal” treatment goal, the treatment mightnot be deemed a success even though the amount of measured improvementon an absolute scale in the latter situation might be higher than in thelimited treatment situation.

Typically, appliances such as fixed braces and wires are applied to apatient's teeth to gradually reposition them from an initial arrangementto a final arrangement. The diagnosis and treatment planning process oforthodontic cases can be imprecise as the final dentition of a patientis based on the knowledge and expertise of the treating doctor inassembling various parameters in an assessment of each patient'scondition and in a determination of a final position for each tooth.Different clinicians will vary in their definitions of individualorthodontic parameters and their definition of how a case should ideallybe treated will also often vary.

To overcome some of these subjective issues, various indices have beenused to more objectively define a patient's initial dentition and finaloutcome. For example, the PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) index identifieshow far a tooth is from a good occlusion. A score is assigned to variousocclusal traits which make up a malocclusion. The individual scores aresummed to obtain an overall total, representing the degree a casedeviates from ideal functional alignment and occlusion. The PAR graderis then calibrated to a known standard set of orthodontic conditions sothis individual is able to rate new cases similarly.

In PAR, a score of zero would indicate ideal alignment and positioningof all orthodontic dental components as defined by generally acceptedocclusal and aesthetic relationships the orthodontic community hasadopted, and higher scores would indicate increased levels ofirregularity. The overall score can be recorded on both pre- andpost-treatment dental casts. The difference between these scoresrepresents the degree of improvement as a result of orthodonticintervention. In addition to the PAR index, other indices may be usedsuch as ICON, IOTN and ABO. These indices also rely on individual dentalmeasurements in order to derive an assessment of deviation from anideal.

What is missing from the current indices is a system for caseclassification categorization. While there may exist classificationsystems for individual components of a dental malocclusion, a systematicmethod to objectively classify and catalogue the entire orthodonticdental condition in each dimension does not exist. More importantly,because in the majority of orthodontic treatment, a patient-specifictreatment goal is not pre-established (other than “ideal”) and used as abasis from which to judge the achieved treatment outcome, not only doesa need exist to define parameters in such a way that each dentalparameter of a patient's individual dentition can be objectivelylabeled, catalogued, and searched, there also exists a need to create anindexing system that can also be used to objectively characterize apatient's treatment goal in addition to the starting dentition,treatment outcome and treatment plan, so that specific guidance can beprovided on future treatment plans, and also so that meta-analyses canbe conducted to better understand the broader patient population.

In view of the foregoing, it would be desirable to have methods andsystems to provide indexing and cataloguing of orthodontic relateddiagnostic and treatment components.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In view of the foregoing, in accordance with the various embodiments ofthe present invention, there are provided methods and system forobjectively cataloguing orthodontic profiles and associating theprofiles to a patient's starting dentition, target dentition, finaldentition, treatment options and treatment plan.

These and other features and advantages of the present invention will beunderstood upon consideration of the following detailed description ofthe invention and the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of the overall system for practicing thevarious embodiments of the present invention;

FIG. 2 illustrates a tabular representation of the indexing systemstored in the storage unit of FIG. 1 in accordance with one embodimentof the present invention;

FIG. 3 illustrates a representation of possible treatment goals for anygiven orthodontic case in one aspect of the present invention;

FIG. 4 illustrates a matrix representation for the possible treatmentgoals shown in FIG. 3 formatted in accordance with the tabularrepresentation shown in FIG. 2 in accordance with one embodiment of thepresent invention;

FIG. 5 illustrates the lower arch length category for use in theindexing system in accordance with one embodiment of the presentinvention;

FIG. 6 illustrates the selection process display for use in the indexingsystem for the identified primary concern as “buck teeth” in accordancewith one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary selection process display 700 forcapturing one component of the sagittal dimension discrepancy for thepatient's right side in one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 8 illustrates an exemplary selection process display 700 forcapturing one component of the sagittal dimension discrepancy for thepatient's left side in one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 9 illustrates an exemplary selection process display 900 forcapturing one component of the vertical dimension in one embodiment ofthe present invention;

FIG. 10 illustrates an exemplary selection process display 1000 forcapturing one component of the horizontal/transverse dimension in oneembodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 11, an exemplary selection process display 1100 for capturing onecomponent of the arch length discrepancy category in accordance with oneembodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 12 illustrates an exemplary selection process display 1200 forcapturing another component of the arch length discrepancy category inaccordance with one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 13 illustrates an exemplary patient summary display 1300 displayedon terminal 101 for use in the indexing system in accordance with oneembodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 14 illustrates a patient database 1400 in accordance with oneembodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 15 illustrates the selection process for representative componentsfor use in the indexing system in accordance with an embodiment of thepresent invention;

FIG. 16 illustrates an exemplary series of database addresses generatedby combining the initial condition address with the treatment goaladdress in one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 17 illustrates an exemplary database for a patient in anotherembodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 18 is a flowchart illustrating the procedure for identifying adentition profile using the indexing system in accordance with oneembodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of the overall indexing system 100 forpracticing the various embodiments of the present invention. Theindexing system 100 in one embodiment includes a terminal 101, which maybe configured as a personal computer, workstation, or mainframe, andwhich includes a user interface input device 103 and a user interfaceoutput device 105, a storage unit 107, and a central server 109.

Referring to FIG. 1, the user interface input device 103 may include akeyboard and may further include a pointing devices and/or a scanner,including x-ray or intra-oral scanner. The pointing device may be anindirect pointing device such as a mouse, trackball, touchpad, orgraphics tablet, or a direct pointing device such as a touchscreenincorporated into the user interface output device 150. Other types ofuser interface input devices, such as voice recognition systems, may beused within the scope of the present invention.

Referring again to FIG. 1, the user interface output device 105 mayinclude a printer and a display subsystem, which includes a displaycontroller and a display device coupled to the controller. The displaydevice may be a cathode ray tube (CRT), a flat-panel device such as aliquid crystal display, or a projection device. The display subsystemmay also provide nonvisual display such as audio output.

The indexing system 100 shown in FIG. 1 also includes the data storageunit 107 which is configured to, under the access and control of eithera central server 109 or a client application, to maintain the basicprogramming and data constructs that provide the functionality of thepresent invention. Software is stored in storage unit 107 which mayinclude a memory unit and file storage unit. The memory unit may includea main random access memory (RAM) for storage of instructions and dataduring program execution and a read-only memory (ROM) in which fixedinstructions are stored.

The file storage unit of the data storage unit 107 may providepersistent (nonvolatile) storage for program and data files, andtypically includes at least one hard disk drive and at least one CD-ROMdrive (with associated removable media). There may also be other devicessuch as a floppy disk drive and optical drives (all with theirassociated removable media). Additionally, the file storage unit 113 mayinclude drives of the type with removable media cartridges, such as harddisk cartridges and flexible disk cartridges. One or more of the drivesmay be located at a remote location, such as in central server 109 on alocal area network or at a site on the Internet's World Wide Web or theentire system may be a stand-alone software application resident on theuser's system.

In one aspect of the present invention, the central server 109 may beconfigured to communicate with the terminal 101 and storage unit 107 toaccess software stored in the storage unit 107 based on and in responseto the input received from terminal 101, and to perform additionalprocessing based on procedures and/or routines in accordance with theinstructions or input information received from the terminal 101.

Referring back to FIG. 1, the indexing system 100 in accordance with oneembodiment of the present invention organizes orthodontic needs by themost common configurations of orthodontic discrepancies in the differentdimensions: sagittal, vertical, horizontal/transverse, and arch length.The categories may be expanded to specifically capture other componentssuch as facial profile, individual dental configurations, dynamicfunctional relationships, and surrounding soft tissue conditions;however discrepancies in these four categories capture a significantportion of orthodontic related dental problems or concerns. Within eachcategory, there may be a predetermined number of individual componentsto characterize the potential conditions for that dimension. For eachcondition, a predetermined combination of different possible conditionsmay be created. This collection of predefined combinations for eachcomponent, where each component belongs to one of the four maincategories described, in one embodiment defines a matrix such that anypatient at any time point may be defined as a specific address withinthe matrix. Both the matrix and address matrix may be stored in storageunit 107.

FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary tabular representation of the indexingsystem matrix stored in the storage unit 107 of FIG. 1 in accordancewith one embodiment of the present invention. The exemplary table 200 ofFIG. 2 illustrates a simplified version of the possible conditions forone component within each of the four categories.

Referring to FIG. 2, the table 200 includes a category field 201, areference component field 202, and the pre-defined options field 203.Table 200 also includes a number of options field 204. The categoryfield 201 in one embodiment includes the categories for which referencedentition condition information is stored. In the exemplary embodiment,the categories may include: sagittal, vertical, horizontal, and archlength. In this exemplary embodiment, the reference component field 202includes one common component within each dimension by whichmalocclusion is judged. The common pre-defined options field 203includes the various levels of malocclusion for that dimension of thecategory. For example, the common malocclusions for the right caninecomponent of the sagittal category are: Full class 2+(greater than fullcusp Class 2), Full (Cusp) Class 2, Partial Class 2 (also called end-onClass 2), and so on. Within each dimensional component selection is alsoa selection for “normal.”

Referring to FIG. 2, the number of options field 204 in one embodimentincludes the number of possible reference conditions in each category,and also a total number of possible combinations of referenceconditions. For example, the sagittal category has seven (7) possiblereference conditions for the canine relationship component and thevertical category has seven (7) reference conditions for the anterioroverbite component. The example shown yields 7×7×7'7=2401 possiblecombinations of reference conditions for the four components, as shownin the table 200 of FIG. 2. In one embodiment, each of these 2401patient case combinations is stored in a database in storage unit 107(FIG. 1), for example, by the central server 109 (FIG. 1). Since therecan be numerous components used to describe each of the four mainorthodontic dimensions and not just one component per dimension asillustrated, in practice, the total number of combinations that can beused to describe a patient may be substantially higher, but at the sametime, will be a finite number such that it may be indexed, catalogued,and queried as described in FIG. 1.

In reference to the index table 200 illustrated in FIG. 2, an identifiermay be composed of a four-position, or “four-bit” matrix: ABCD. In thisfour-bit matrix, in one embodiment of the present invention, the “A”position in the matrix corresponds to the sagittal dimension, the “B”position in the matrix corresponds to the vertical dimension, the “C”position in the matrix corresponds to the horizontal dimension, the “D”position in the matrix corresponds to the arch length dimension.

The actual number or letter in the position of each “bit” of the matrixmay be associated with the corresponding condition within the category.For example, referring again to the exemplary table 200 of FIG. 2, anidentifier of 3256 represents: a right canine partial Class 2, withmoderate anterior deep bite, upper midline to the left 0-1 mm, and lowermoderate crowding. This “3256” identifier corresponds to an address inan indexing database stored in storage unit 107 which has stored in thedatabase, related clinical information for the particular pairing of“3256” to a user-defined treatment goal (for example, discussed infurther detail below with reference to FIG. 4).

Dental Characterization Database

Referring back to FIG. 1, the indexing system 100 in one embodiment ofthe present invention may also be used to represent one or more teethwithin a patient's dentition. Typically an adult patient's dentitionincludes 32 teeth. Dentists usually characterize five surfaces of eachtooth: mesial, occlusal/incisal, distal, buccal/facial, and lingual.Each of these surfaces may be natural or covered by a restoration suchas silver amalgam, composite, porcelain, gold, or metal crown. The toothmay also be missing or have been treated with a root canal or animplant. These combinations may be represented with an indexing systemfor the initial dentition, target dentition (treatment goal), and finaldentition which is the outcome of the treatment.

For each tooth in a patient's dentition, there may be a number ofpossible conditions based on the characteristics of the tooth, such asthe surface of the tooth and whether the tooth as been treated or ismissing. The combinations of different possible conditions of the teethdefine a matrix. An exemplary embodiment of the present inventionincludes a 32-position address within the matrix, where each position inthe address corresponds to a tooth in a patient's dentition and includesa sub-address in which alphanumeric characters or other representationsrepresent the current condition of the tooth.

A “5-bit” sub-address for each tooth includes positions 12345 where eachof the positions “1” to “5” represents one of the five surfaces of thetooth. In particular, position 1 of the sub-address corresponds to themesial surface of the tooth, position 2 of the sub-address correspondsto the occlusal or incisal surface of the tooth, position 3 of thesub-address corresponds to the distal surface of the tooth, position 4of the sub-address corresponds to buccal or facial surface of the tooth,and position 5 of the sub-address corresponds to the lingual surface ofthe tooth.

Moreover, each of the following characters “A” to “N” corresponds to acondition of the particular surface of the tooth in the sub-address.

A = amalgam B = composite C = porcelain veneer D = gold E = porcelaincrown F = gold crown G = gold crown with root canal H = porcelain crownwith root canal I = amalgam with root canal J = composite with rootcanal K = gold crown with implant L = porcelain crown with implant M =missing N = natural

For example, consider the following patient identifier 1:NNABN. Theidentifier 1:NNABN would represent: tooth number 1 of a 32-bit addresswhich has a natural mesial surface (subaddress position 1), an occlusalamalgam (subaddress position 2), a natural distal surface (subaddressposition 3), a buccal/facial composite (subaddress position 4), and anatural lingual surface (subaddress position 5).

In an exemplary embodiment of patient's initial dentition, targetdentition (treatment goal), and final dentition, such example may beconfigured as:

TotalAddress=SubAddress1:SubAddress2:SubAddress3

SubAddress1=Teeth 1-32 initial

SubAddress2=Teeth 1-32 target

SubAddress3=Teeth 1-32 current, timepoint today

whereby each of the of the 1-32 may further include an additionsub-matrix of 1-5 surfaces as previously described.

In this manner, dentists may easily query their practice database todetermine how much dental work has been done and remains to be done.They can also track trends of use in their practice and what are themost common procedures in the practice. The patient matrix may also beused in forensics for patient identification purposes, as well as fornational security and other security purposes.

FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary tabulation of the possible treatmentgoals of the indexing system treatment goal matrix stored in the storageunit 107 of FIG. 1 in accordance with one embodiment of the presentinvention. Four examples of treatment goals are the following:

Treatment Goal 1: Align for restorative dentistry—the objective of thisgoal is to better position specific teeth for the purpose of improvedplacement of dental restorations such as crowns, bridges, and implants.Some of the patient's dental components may be left as is (untreated) ifthey do not contribute to the purpose of improvement of the restorativegoal.

Treatment Goal 2: Esthetic alignment—the objective of this goal is toalign the patient's anterior teeth for the purpose of improvedesthetics. Generally speaking, the patient's bite may be left as is(untreated) if it does not contribute to the purpose of improving theesthetic component of the patient's smile.

Treatment Goal 3: Align to Class 1 canine function—the objective of thisgoal is to improve the anterior function of the teeth while alsoimproving the anterior esthetic component. Generally speaking, thepatient's posterior occlusion may be left as is if it does notcontribute to the improvement of the canine function and/or anterioresthetics.

Treatment Goal 4: Align to ideal—the objective of this goal is to makethe entire bite to “textbook” ideal, including both the canine and molarfunction.

FIG. 4 illustrates an expanded version of FIG. 3 using thecharacteristics as defined by the tabulation shown in FIG. 2. Morespecifically, each of the four treatment goals identified in FIG. 3 maybe further refined and formatted according to the tabulation andindexing shown in FIG. 2 to describe the target objective of treatmentin greater detail according to each individual component.

For example, for the treatment goal 1 for alignment for restorativedentistry, an example of this goal according to the 4-bit matrix formatin FIG. 2 may be XXX4 where the “X” is the patient's existingrelationship for that component left untreated, and only the fourthdigit is planned for treatment. Furthermore, for the treatment goal 2for esthetic alignment, an example of this goal according to the 4-bitmatrix format in FIG. 2 may be XX44 where “X” is the patient's existingrelationship for that component left untreated, and only the third andfourth digits (representing the transverse and arch length components,respectively) are planned for treatment.

In addition, for treatment goal 3 for alignment to Class 1 canine, anexample of this goal according to the 4-bit matrix format in FIG. 2 maybe 4X44 whereby “X” is the patient's existing relationship for thatcomponent left untreated. In this example, only the second digitcomponent (corresponding to the vertical dimension) is not planned fortreatment. Finally, for treatment goal 3 for alignment to ideal, anexample of this goal according to the 4-bit matrix defined in FIG. 2,may be 4444.

There are various ways to generate an identifier which represents apatient's unique problem or case type. Traditionally, the method hasbeen to describe and define a characteristic and have the trainedindividual subjectively identify the condition or “label” which bestrepresents the patient's condition. To reduce the variability in thismethod requires calibration and/or objective measures to define each ofthe labels.

Another method involves using a visual image-based interface. Tocharacterize a patient's dentition, a user compares the patient'sdentition to images of reference dentition conditions which depict theseverity of malocclusion, or lack thereof. The user then identifieswhere the patient's dentition condition falls within a range ofreference conditions depicting malocclusion and selects the image thateither best represents the patient, or selects a relative position ofthe patient's condition from a continuous gradient of patient imagedepictions of the specific problem. The visual image interface can bepresented to the user without any descriptions or labels to avoid anypre-conceived biases associated with the label.

Visual images have been previously described in the ICON indexing systemfor example, to describe an esthetic component of the patient. In theICON system, the assessor selects 1 of 10 images which best representsthe patient's anterior esthetic component. Through calibration, multipleusers are then able to determine a patient's esthetic component withreasonable consistency. The use of a visual interface to capture everycomponent of the patient's orthodontic dental condition however, has notpreviously been described as an interface for creation of a digitalpatient database.

FIG. 5 illustrates the lower arch length component 500 for use in theindexing system in accordance with one embodiment of the presentinvention. This illustration of the lower arch length component 500 isan exemplary visual scale allowing the user to select an image which issimilar to the patient's dentition condition. Referring to FIG. 5, thereare shown seven images of the lower arch, each representing a possiblereference condition for the lower arch length category. In thisexemplary embodiment, images 501-507 represents the 7 imagescorresponding to the individual fields for the “Lower Arch Length”component of “Arch Length” dimension of FIG 2. The user simply selectswhich of the seven images is best represented in the patient. Or theymay be able to select where in between two adjacent images the patientcan be best described. They do not need to know what the technical labelor term is; they simply need to select an image or area between twoimages based on direct comparison of the existing condition to thepictures presented.

In the exemplary embodiment shown in FIG. 5, each of the seven images501-507 has a corresponding predefined alphanumeric character. Thus,when an image is selected, the associated predefined alphanumericcharacter is added to the identifier address of the patient. By labelingeach category with an alphanumeric character, the patient's dentitionmay be characterized through alphanumeric addressing. The output to theuser may explain the specific details of their selection in greaterdetail, including the technical description and treatment optionsassociated with such a condition. In an alternate embodiment, analphanumeric character may be generated when the user selects the areain between adjacent images, representing that the patient's conditionfalls in between the condition of the adjacent images selected. The userinterface may also be a combination of both direct selection of theimage as well as in-between selection of images.

Referring now to FIG. 6, an exemplary doctor and patient informationdisplay 600 for the indexing system 100 is illustrated in accordancewith one embodiment of the present invention. This display 600 includesinformation input by a user into fields 601-603 to identify a patient.In particular, a patient's name is input into field 601, a patient'sgender is input into field 602, and a patient's primary concern(s) isinput into field 603. The preferred embodiment of field 603 is acheck-box selection of pre-defined possible conditions which can then becatalogued according to the selections of the user. It will beappreciated that other patient information may be added. Once thepatient information has been entered, a user can select a predefinedinput command or button to move onto the next display, which isillustrated in FIG. 7.

Referring to FIG. 7, an exemplary selection process display 700 is shownfor the sagittal dimension (matrix address position “A” in FIG. 2)—rightbuccal, right canine/cuspid component. A series of images of referencedentition conditions 701-703 are displayed in conjunction with buttons704 allowing the images to be scrolled to the left or right. A userclicks the left or right arrow buttons 704 to select the image of thereference dentition condition that best reflects the patient's currentcondition specifically at the location(s) indicated by the focusingarrows indicated in 702. In this exemplary embodiment, a user clicks theleft or right arrow buttons to select the cuspid (canine) relationshipthat is similar to a patient's current occlusion.

Once the selection is made, the next button 705 is pressed to move ontothe next screen. The exemplary selection process display 700 alsoincludes buttons 706-709 to allow a user to go back, access a glossary,ask for advice, and save the information, respectively.

Referring to FIG. 8, an exemplary selection process display 800 is shownfor the sagittal category—left buccal, left cuspid component. A seriesof images of reference dentition conditions 801-803 are displayed inassociation with buttons 804 allowing the images to be scrolled to theleft or right. A user clicks the left or right arrow buttons 804 toselect the image of the reference dentition condition that best reflectsthe patient's current condition. In this exemplary embodiment, a userclicks the left or right arrow buttons to select the cuspid relationshipthat is similar to a patient's current occlusion.

Once the selection is made, the next button 805 is pressed to move ontothe next display which is illustrated in FIG. 9. The exemplary selectionprocess display 800 also includes buttons 806-809 to allow a user to goback, access a glossary, ask for advice, and save the information,respectively.

Referring to FIG. 9, an exemplary selection process display 900 is shownfor the vertical dimension (matrix address position “B” in FIG.2)—anterior overbite component. A series of images of referenceconditions 901-903 are displayed in conjunction with buttons 904allowing the images to be scrolled to the left or right. A user clicksthe left or right arrow buttons 904 to select the image of the referencedentition condition that best reflects the patient's current condition.In this exemplary embodiment, a user clicks the left or right arrowbuttons 904 to select the anterior vertical overbite relationshipcomponent that is similar to a patient's degree of open or deep bite.

Once the selection is made, the next button 905 is pressed to move ontothe next display, which is illustrated in FIG. 10. The exemplaryselection process display 900 also includes buttons 906-909 to allow auser to go back, access a glossary, ask for advice, and save theinformation, respectively.

Referring to FIG. 10, an exemplary selection process display 1000 isshown for the horizontal/transverse dimension (matrix address position“C” in FIG. 2)—upper and lower midline components. An image 1010representing a reference dentition condition is altered by clicking theupper arrows 1001-1002 corresponding to the upper arch of the image1010, and by clicking the lower arrows 1003-1004 corresponding to thelower arch of the image 1010 to best match the midline of the image 1010to a patient's midline component relationship. Once the selection ismade, the next button 1005 is pressed to move onto the next display,which is illustrated in FIG. 11. The exemplary selection process display1000 of FIG. 10 also includes buttons 1006-1009 to allow a user to goback, access a glossary, ask for advice, and save the information,respectively.

Referring to FIG. 11, an exemplary selection process display 1100 isshown for the upper arch length category. An image of a referencedentition condition 1101 and descriptions of reference dentitionconditions 1102, 1103 are displayed in association with buttons 1104allowing the reference dentition condition image and descriptions to bescrolled to the left or right. A user clicks the left or right arrowbuttons 1104 to select the image or description of the referencedentition condition that best reflects the patient's current condition.In this exemplary embodiment, a user clicks the left or right arrowbuttons 1104 to select the image or description of the referencedentition condition that is similar to a patient's upper arch lengthfrom the occlusal view. In this particular embodiment, if there is bothcrowding and spacing present, a user is instructed to use the net amountof crowding or spacing, but it may be possible to have each aspectcaptured independently.

Again, once the selection is made, the next button 1105 is pressed tomove onto the next display which is illustrated in FIG. 12. Theexemplary selection process display 1100 also includes buttons 1106-1109to allow a user to go back, access a glossary, ask for advice, and savethe information, respectively.

Referring to FIG. 12, an exemplary selection process display 1200 isshown for the arch length dimension (matrix position “D” in FIG.2)—lower arch length component. An image of a reference dentitioncondition 1201 and descriptions of reference dentition conditions 1202,1203 are displayed in association with buttons 1204 allowing thereference dentition condition image and descriptions to be scrolled tothe left or right. A user clicks the left or right arrow buttons 1204 toselect the image or description of the reference dentition conditionthat best reflects the patient's current condition for the lower archlength component of arch length In this exemplary embodiment, a userclicks the left or right arrow buttons 1204 to select the image ordescription of the reference dentition condition that is similar to apatient's lower arch length from the occlusal view. In this example, ifboth crowding and spacing are present, the user is instructed to use thenet amount of crowding or spacing. It may be possible however to capturecrowding and spacing independently in order to derive the netdiscrepancy.

Once the selection is made, the next button 1205 is pressed to move ontothe next display, which is illustrated in FIG. 13. The exemplaryselection process display 1200 of FIG. 12 also includes buttons1206-1209 to allow a user to go back, access a glossary, ask for advice,and save the information, respectively.

FIG. 13 illustrates an exemplary patient summary tabulation 1300 foroutput display on terminal 101 for use in the indexing system inaccordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The exemplarypatient summary display 1300 is generated from the information inputfrom previous displays 600-1200, as illustrated in corresponding FIGS.6-12, respectively. Referring to FIG. 13, the selections made during theprocesses and displays described above and illustrated in conjunctionwith FIGS. 6-12 are summarized as shown in the summary display 1300 inone embodiment of the present invention.

For example, for each reference dentition category including sagittal,vertical, horizontal and arch length, the corresponding malocclusionreference component (for example, right canine, anterior overbite, uppermidline relative to lower midline, and lower arch length, respectively),and each of which is associated with a selected one of the pre-definedoptions (for example, right canine partial Class 2, moderate anteriordeep bite, upper midline to left 0-1 m, and lower moderate crowding,respectively). Also can be seen from FIG. 13 is the selected value ofthe selected pre-defined options 203 (FIG. 2) as tabulated andillustrated in FIG. 2. The user is also able to edit the dentitioncondition information in each of the categories by selecting thecorresponding “EDIT” button to go back to the page desired andreselecting the image corresponding to that category.

In this manner, in one embodiment of the present invention, theinformation input by the user during the selection process is indexedand catalogued in a patient database (for example, the database 1400shown in FIG. 14 below) of the indexing system 100. In one embodiment ofthe present invention, the selection process discussed in conjunctionwith FIGS. 6-12 for the indexing and cataloguing is transparent to theuser. The patient information input by the user in the selection processis used to generate both the summary display as illustrated in FIG. 13and an identifier representing the dentition conditions of the patient.FIGS. 6-12 illustrate the selection process display 600 for use in theindexing system 100 for various categories in accordance with oneembodiment of the present invention. This is the selection process forinputting a patient's dentition information. It will be appreciated thatalthough FIGS. 7-12 illustrate reference dentition conditionsrepresented by pictorial images, the present invention is not intendedto be limited to such representations. The reference dentitionconditions may also be represented by symbols, icons, descriptions,graphs, 3-D objects, radiographs, forms, and other types of images. Thereference conditions may also be user-defined through an interactivegraphical image such that the user best recreates the condition observedin the patient as a means of input for the system.

FIG. 14 illustrates a patient database 1400 for use in the indexingsystem 100 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.The patient database 1400 includes a patient field 1401, an indexingdatabase address field 1402, and one or more category fields 1403. Inthe exemplary database of FIG. 14, the category fields 1403 include asagittal category field 1404, a vertical category field 1405, ahorizontal category field 1406, an upper arch length category field1407, a lower length category field 1408, a rotation field 1409, avertical correction field 1410, and a midline correction field 1411.

Referring to FIG. 14, the patient field 1401 includes the patient name.The indexing database address field 1402 includes the patientidentifier. This patient identifier corresponds to an address in theindexing database 300, for example, as shown in FIG. 3. The address inthe indexing database 300 is associated with treatment information forthat particular diagnostic combination. The category fields 1403, whichin this exemplary embodiment are the sagittal category field 1404, thevertical category field 1405, the horizontal category field 1406, theupper arch length category field 1407, the lower length category field1408, the rotation field 1409, the vertical correct field 1410, and themidline correct field 1411, include the patient's one or more dentitionconditions in the respective categories. For example, referring to FIG.14, patient L. Smith's dentition condition in the sagittal categoryfield 1404 is class I. Patient M. Jones' dentition condition in theupper arch length category field 1407 is normal spacing. The categoryfields also indicate whether the particular reference condition iseligible for treatment.

In this manner, the patient identifier may be configured to representthe patient conditions. For example, referring to the indexing databaseaddress field 1402, it is shown that L. Smith's identifier is 55772752.Since the identifier includes eight positions, the identifier is aneight-position matrix. The number in each position of the identifierrepresents a particular condition within a particular category. In thisexemplary embodiment, the first position of the identifier matrixrepresents the patient condition in the sagittal category. For example,the sagittal category field 1404 indicates that L. Smith has a class Imalocclusion. Thus, the number 5 in the first position of the identifierrepresents a class I malocclusion in the sagittal category.

Referring back to FIG. 14, the second position of the identifier matrixrepresents the patient condition in the vertical category. For example,the vertical category field 1405 indicates that L. Smith has normalocclusion. Thus, the number 5 in the second position of the identifierrepresents a normal occlusion in the vertical category. The thirdposition of the identifier matrix represents the patient condition inthe horizontal category. For example, the horizontal category field 1406indicates that L. Smith has a cross bite. Thus, the number 7 in thethird position of the identifier represents cross bite in the horizontalcategory.

Moreover, the fourth position of the identifier matrix represents thepatient condition in the upper arch length category. For example, theupper arch length category field 1407 indicates that L. Smith hasmoderate crowding. Thus, the number 7 in the fourth position of theidentifier represents moderate crowding in the upper arch lengthcategory. In addition, the fifth position of the identifier matrixrepresents the patient condition in the lower arch length category. Forexample, the lower arch length category field 1408 indicates that L.Smith has moderate spacing. Thus, the number 2 in the fifth position ofthe identifier represents moderate spacing in the lower arch lengthcategory.

In addition, the sixth position of the identifier matrix represents thepatient condition in the rotation category. For example, the rotationcategory field 1409 indicates that L. Smith has <20° rotation. Thus, thenumber 7 in the sixth position of the identifier represents <20°rotation in the rotation category. Further, the seventh position of theidentifier matrix represents the patient condition in the verticalcorrect category. For example, the vertical correct category field 1410indicates that L. Smith has no intrusion/extraction. Thus, the number 5in the seventh position of the identifier represents nointrusion/extraction in the vertical correct category.

Finally, referring yet again to FIG. 14, the eighth position of theidentifier matrix represents the patient condition in the midlinecorrect category. For example, the midline correct category field 1411indicates that L. Smith has >2 MM midline correct. Thus, the number 2 inthe eighth position of the identifier represents >2 MM midline correctin the midline correct category.

In addition, in one embodiment of the present invention, the conditionsin the categories are arranged in ascending order by difficulty and thecategories are sorted in order of difficulty so that it is possible todefine a matrix where 11111 is the mildest case and 33233 is the mostsevere case. Additionally, each index in the matrix is weighted toderive a composite score of the overall case.

FIG. 15 illustrates an alternate embodiment of the present invention forcapturing an address in the selection process for use in the indexingsystem. FIG. 15 illustrates the table 200 of FIG. 2 used directly as agraphical interface. In such embodiment, each reference condition asshown and illustrated in tabular format as rectangles may be representedas user input buttons with text which may be clicked to highlight andselect the appropriate reference condition. The assumption for this typeof interface is that the user understands the definitions of the text inorder to select the appropriate button. When the buttons are pressed toselect a particular reference condition, the selections are highlighted(shown in bold in FIG. 15). Clicking any button twice will deselect theinitial selection so that another selection can be made. In this manner,users who are more familiar with the various types of referenceconditions may be able to input the information more quickly thanthrough a visual-image based interface. In this example, the generatedaddress would be “3256.” The “Selected Value” column on the right sideof FIG. 15 is in in one embodiment, transparent to the user/patient, andnot displayed to the user since the address has no relevance to the enduser, and is important only for the database query.

FIG. 16 illustrates an exemplary series of database addresses generatedby combining the initial condition address with the treatment goaladdress in one embodiment of the present invention. As indicated fromthe exemplary table 200 of FIG. 2, there are 2,701 possible patient casecombinations or addresses for four components of seven possibleselection options each. Thus, an identifier address points to one of the2,701 possible combinations in the database. Each identifier isassociated with a field stored in a database of the storage unit 107(FIG. 1). An identifier may be extended so that it represents thepatient's condition at different time points. For example, the databasemay be structured such that time points for initial dentition, targetdentition, and actual final dentition are captured as separateaddresses. For example, consider the following address:ABCD: A′B′C′D′:A″B″C″D″

In this arrangement, the first four positions “A” to “D” of the matrixrepresent the patient's initial dentition (as previously described),positions “A′” to “D′” of the matrix represent the patient's targetdentition or treatment goal, and positions “A″” to “D″” of the matrixrepresent the patient's actual final dentition or treatment outcome.Because the number of positions in the matrix may be variable, and sinceeach position can include symbols, alphanumeric characters or otherrepresentations, the depth of individual patient cases that is stored ismay be detailed and specific to the patient and/or the associatedprofile or condition. Using the 4 possible treatment outcomesillustrated in FIG. 4 and the 2,701 possible combinations in FIG. 2,this equates to 2,701×4=10,804 possible paired combinations betweeninitial and goal.

FIG. 17 illustrates an exemplary database for a patient with an indexaddress of “3256” and the four possible treatment goals of 1 through 4.The resulting four combined addresses have different data for each ofthe parameters. This information is reported to the user either (1) uponcompletion of the case characterization, whereby all possible treatmentgoal options are presented to the user or (2) upon completion of thecase characterization and selection of a single treatment goal, wherebyonly the information from this address-goal pair is presented to theuser.

For each of these paired combinations, a combined address can becreated, with database assets in a “digital mailbox” associated witheach address. Assets for each digital mailbox can include, but is notlimited to: treatment plan information related to the case-treatmentgoal pairing, such as a text description of the treatment condition andgoals, treatment precautions, treatment length estimates, doctor skillset requirements, prescription data, sample case data, and casedifficulty. This data may be generated using expert opinion,computational algorithms, and/or historical case content.

For example, with respect to FIG. 13, where the case is identified as a“3256” and using the 4 types of treatment goals as shown in FIG. 4,combining the two yields four distinct database addresses: 3256:1,3256:2, 3256:3, and 3256:4. Each of the addresses can be populated withinformation specific to the case-treatment goal combination. All fouroptions can be simultaneously displayed to the user as “treatmentoptions” or the user can select a specific treatment goal and have asingle specific resulting treatment option data displayed. It is alsoconceivable that the user may also select any number of specific goals,and each of the data associated with each goal selected is reported tothe user depending on the initial condition parameters selected.

FIG. 18 illustrates a process 1800 for identifying a dentition problemor condition of a patient. The process 1800 is discussed more fully inconjunction with FIGS. 6-17. At step 1801, the user starts by enteringidentification information such as doctor and patient name, in additionto patient chief concern(s) (FIG. 6). In one embodiment, this comparisonmay be performed by the central server 109 (FIG. 1) based on informationreceived, for example, from the terminal 101, and/or based on storedinformation retrieved from the data storage unit 107. This and otherrelated transactions in the process may be performed over a data networksuch as the internet via a secure connection. The user then selects oneof two user interfaces to input the patient's dental condition. Thepreferred method for the novice user is the visual-user interface (FIG.7-12) shown as step 1802. The advanced user will likely prefer thealternative user interface (FIG. 15) illustrated as step 1803.

Referring to FIG. 18, at step 1804 an initial dentition condition of apatient in each category is compared to one or more reference conditionsin the same category. After comparing the initial dentition condition ofthe patient in each category to one or more reference conditions foreach respective category, at step 1804, the selected reference conditionsimilar to the initial patient condition in the same category isreceived. Thereafter, at step 1805, the patient identifier is thengenerated based on the combination of alphanumeric characterscorresponding to the selected reference conditions. Edits can be made tothe inputs during the summary page review (step 1804) until the user issatisfied with the information submitted.

The output following the completion of the data input is a translationsummary (FIG. 13), which formats the user input into technicallyrelevant and correct terminology. At the same time, the user input isalso translated into a database address representing the current patientcondition (FIG. 15)—step 1805. Once the database address is created, theuser can choose to view all possible treatment options for this patient(OPTION 1), or specifically select a treatment goal and view thespecific goal associated with the user's selection (OPTION 2). To viewall the possible treatment options for the patient (OPTION 1), thedatabase (FIG. 17) is queried at step 1806, and all data associated withthe input address is presented to the user at step 1807 (END 1).

Referring back to FIG. 18, if the user desires to select a specificgoal, the specific goal is first defined by the user through a selectioninterface at step 1808 (FIG. 3), and the selection is then translatedinto a database address at step 1809 (FIG. 4), and the two addresses(patient condition and treatment goal) merged to create a combinedaddress or index at step 1810 (FIG. 16). This combined address is thenused to query the database ate step 1811 (FIG. 17) in order to producedata specific to a single patient condition-treatment goal combinationat step 1812 (END 2).

For OPTION 2, it may also be possible that the user can select multiplegoals and only the data specific to those selected goals be produced forthe user. Once the user has reached END 1 or END 2, the user has theoption to purchase the product for the purpose of any one of theselected treatment goals, by selecting a pre-populated or semi-populatedtreatment prescription which can be part of the output data presented tothe user through this experience.

As discussed above, the user interface can provide one or more patientcases from the indexing database that matches the patient problem.Additionally, a range of patient cases from the indexing database thataddress specific components of the patient's problem can be provided. Inthis manner, in one embodiment of the present invention, search toolsmay be created to run statistics using the patient identifiers. Forexample, one search request may be to find all 131X cases. In thisexemplary search request, X represents any character in the fourthposition of the address. Thus, the search request would be to find allpatient identifiers having “131” as the first 3 digits of their patientidentifier address.

By labeling historically treated cases with this identificationmethodology, a catalog of orthodontic treatment can be created forfuture reference when planning treatment and assessing treatmentoutcomes. The result is a front-end user interface for capturing thedescription of an orthodontic condition and classifying the orthodonticcondition in a systematic scalable way. Referring again to FIG. 18, oncethe identifier is generated at step 1805, one or more treatment optionscan be determined using information generated from a database query. Thegenerated one or more treatment options may be stored in the datastorage unit 107 (FIG. 1), and also, be provided to the terminal 101 fordisplay on the display unit.

Given the diagnosis and treatment planning of orthodontic treatments caninclude a significant subjective component that may vary depending uponthe doctor's preferences and level of training, the indexing systemprovides a comprehensive, robust, and a substantially objective approachto establishing the patient diagnosis, treatment goal, and treatmentplan. The patient identifier of the present invention which representsthe patient's case, as well as the target treatment goal and finaloutcome enables treatment outcome profiles to be objectively catalogued,and for the catalog to be evaluated based on probabilities anddistributions. Indices such as prognosis and case difficulty can beassigned to matrix combinations, enabling similar cases to be treatedlike similarly successful cases. Treatment options may be correlated forcompleteness and ease of use. Treatment products, such as appliances,may be associated with specific matrix combinations so that theirsuggested use is more closely tied to a successful outcome.

Within the scope of the present invention, other embodiments forinputting a patient's dentition condition are also contemplated. Forexample, a configurable three-dimensional model may be used to input theinformation. In such embodiment, the user may recreate the patientdentition condition for the dimension. Alternatively, athree-dimensional graphics model may be staged to represent the entirerange of possible reference conditions for any given dimension. In suchembodiment, a user manipulates a slider to match a stage of the rangewhich is closest to the actual patient condition.

It will also be appreciated that this method of objectivelycharacterizing a case according to individual components is not limitedto the time points of pre-treatment, treatment goal, and post-treatment,and that any time point during treatment and following treatment may bealso catalogued in a similar fashion using the same input and databasesystem.

It will also be appreciated that in this exemplary embodiment althoughonly one reference condition is discussed as being selected for aparticular category, the present invention is not intended to be solimiting. The selection of one or more reference conditions within eachcategory is within the scope of the present invention.

Accordingly, a method for characterizing a dentition of a patient in oneembodiment of the present invention includes comparing an initialpatient condition in each of a plurality of dentition categories withone or more reference conditions in each of the plurality of dentitioncategories, where each of the one or more reference conditions has acorresponding representation, selecting at least one reference conditionin one or more of the plurality of dentition categories, where eachselected reference condition is similar to the initial patient conditionin a same dentition category, and generating a patient identifier basedon the corresponding representations of each selected referencecondition.

In one aspect, the plurality of dentition categories may include atleast two of: sagittal, vertical, horizontal, upper and arch lengthdimensions, or a number of a tooth in a dentition of a patient.

Moreover, the method may further include determining whether eachinitial patient condition is indicated for treatment based on treatmentinformation corresponding to the selected reference condition, providingone or more treatment options for each initial patient conditionindicated for treatment, where the one or more treatment options includeone or more of a treatment description, a treatment goal, a time tocomplete the treatment, a difficulty level, and a skill level tocomplete the treatment, an example of the treatment option.

Further, in another aspect, the method may also include comparing atleast a portion of the patient identifier with one or more referenceidentifiers, wherein each of the one or more reference identifiersincludes an initial reference dentition and a final reference dentition,selecting at least one reference identifier from the one or morereference identifiers, wherein the selected reference identifierincludes the portion of the patient identifier, and determining a finalpatient dentition based on the final reference dentition correspondingto the selected reference identifier.

A method for characterizing a dentition of a patient in accordance withanother embodiment of the present invention includes receiving aninitial dentition of a patient, generating an initial profilerepresenting the initial dentition of the patient, identifying aninitial malocclusion from the initial profile, and comparing at least aportion of the initial profile with one or more reference profiles ofreference dentitions, where said one or more reference profiles includesa reference malocclusion substantially similar to the initialmalocclusion at the beginning, during any treatment stage, or finaloutcome treatment position.

Also, the method may also include the step of selecting at least one ofthe one or more reference profiles, where said one or more referenceprofiles has a related final reference dentition.

Additionally, in a further aspect, the method also include providing atarget dentition of the patient based on the final reference dentition.

The step of generating an initial profile in one embodiment may includevisually categorizing the initial dentition of the patient.

Moreover, the method may also include identifying one or more treatmentoptions associated with the one or more reference profiles.

A system for providing an orthodontic profile indexing system inaccordance with still another embodiment of the present inventionincludes a storage unit, and a controller unit operatively coupled tothe storage unit, and configured to compare an initial patient conditionin each of a plurality of dentition categories with one or morereference conditions in each of the plurality of dentition categories,where each of the one or more reference conditions has a correspondingrepresentation, select at least one reference condition in one or moreof the plurality of dentition categories, where each selected referencecondition is similar to the initial patient condition in a samedentition category, and to generate a patient identifier based on thecorresponding representations of each selected reference condition.

The controller unit may be configured to determine whether each initialpatient condition is eligible for treatment based on treatmentinformation corresponding to the selected reference condition, and toprovide one or more treatment options for each initial patient conditioneligible for treatment.

Also, the controller unit may be further configured to compare at leasta portion of the patient identifier with one or more referenceidentifiers, where each of the one or more reference identifiersincludes an initial reference dentition and a final reference dentition,to select at least one reference identifier from the one or morereference identifiers, where the selected reference identifier includesthe portion of the patient identifier, and to determine a final patientdentition based on the final reference dentition corresponding to theselected reference identifier.

In addition, a terminal may be operatively coupled to the controllerunit, and configured to transmit one or more of the initial patientcondition, where the terminal may be further configured to include adisplay unit.

A system for characterizing a dentition of a patient in accordance withstill another embodiment of the present invention includes a centralcontroller unit configured to generate an initial profile representingthe initial dentition of the patient, to identify an initialmalocclusion from the initial profile, and to compare at least a portionof the initial profile with one or more reference profiles of referencedentitions, wherein said one or more reference profiles includes areference malocclusion substantially similar to the initialmalocclusion.

In another aspect, a user terminal may be operatively coupled to thecentral controller unit, the user terminal configured to transmit theinitial dentition of the patient.

The central controller unit may be further configured to select at leastone of the one or more reference profiles, wherein said one or morereference profiles has a related final reference dentition.

In addition, the central controller unit may be further configured toprovide a target dentition of the patient based on the final referencedentition.

The central controller unit may be further configured to visuallycategorize the initial dentition of the patient.

Moreover, the central controller unit may be further configured toidentify one or more treatment options associated with the one or morereference profiles.

In yet still a further aspect, a storage unit may be configured to storeone or more of an initial profile an initial malocclusion, and areference malocclusion.

The various processes described above including the processes performedby the central server 109 (FIG. 1) in the software application executionenvironment in the indexing system 100 including the processes androutines described in conjunction with the Figures may be embodied ascomputer programs developed using an object oriented language thatallows the modeling of complex systems with modular objects to createabstractions that are representative of real world, physical objects andtheir interrelationships. The software required to carry out theinventive process, which may be stored in the memory or data storageunit 107 of the indexing system or internally (not shown) within thecentral server 109, may be developed by a person of ordinary skill inthe art and may include one or more computer program products.

While the characterization of adult dentition has been discussed inconjunction with the embodiments described above, the variousembodiments of the present invention may be used for thecharacterization of child dentitions. In addition, in accordance withthe embodiments of the present invention, the various aspects of thepresent invention may be manually implemented by the user, for example,using print-out documentation, visual graphics, and/or photographicimages of the conditions and/or treatment options, and further, mayinclude, within the scope of the present invention, manual computationor calculation of the results. In this manner, within the scope of thepresent invention, the various embodiments discussed above in thecontext of a computerized system for implementing the aspects of thepresent invention, may be implemented manually.

Various other modifications and alterations in the structure and methodof operation of this invention will be apparent to those skilled in theart without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.Although the invention has been described in connection with specificpreferred embodiments, it should be understood that the invention asclaimed should not be unduly limited to such specific embodiments. It isintended that the following claims define the scope of the presentinvention and that structures and methods within the scope of theseclaims and their equivalents be covered thereby.

1. A method for characterizing a dentition of a patient, comprising:accessing a database including one or more reference conditions in eachof a plurality of dentition categories, each reference conditionincluding a corresponding first value; determining, using a computer, asimilar reference condition to an initial patient condition in each ofthe plurality of dentition categories by: comparing the initial patientcondition in each of the plurality of dentition categories with the oneor more reference conditions in each of the plurality of dentitioncategories; and selecting at least one reference condition in one ormore of the plurality of dentition categories that is similar to theinitial patient condition in a same dentition category; and generating,using the computer, a patient identifier matrix including a plurality ofpositions, wherein: each of the plurality of positions corresponds toone of the plurality of dentition categories; and each of the pluralityof positions includes a second value equal to the first value of theselected reference condition for the corresponding one of the pluralityof dentition categories.
 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the pluralityof dentition categories include at least two of: sagittal, vertical,horizontal, arch length, or a number of a tooth in a dentition of apatient.
 3. The method of claim 2 wherein the plurality of categoriesare applied to at least two of: initial condition, treatment goal, finalcondition, during treatment condition, or post-treatment condition. 4.The method of claim 1 further including the step of defining a treatmentgoal wherein the treatment goal is not ideal in at least one dimensionalcomponent of sagittal, vertical, horizontal, or arch length.
 5. Themethod of claim 1 further including the step of generating one or moreof a treatment description, a time to complete the treatment, adifficulty level, or an example of the treatment option.
 6. The methodof claim 1 further comprising the step of: comparing at least a portionof the patient identifier with one or more reference identifiers,wherein each of the one or more reference identifiers includes aninitial reference dentition and a final reference dentition; selectingat least one reference identifier from the one or more referenceidentifiers, wherein the selected reference identifier includes theportion of the patient identifier; and determining a final patientdentition based on the final reference dentition corresponding to theselected reference identifier.
 7. The method of claim 6 furthercomprising the step of: comparing at least a portion of the patientidentifier and a treatment goal with one or more reference identifiers,wherein each of the one or more reference identifiers includes aninitial reference dentition and a treatment goal reference identifier;and determining a patient dentition goal based on the final referencedentition corresponding to the selected reference identifier.
 8. Asystem for providing an orthodontic profile indexing system, comprising:a non-transitory storage unit including one or more reference conditionsin each of a plurality of dentition categories, each reference conditionincluding a corresponding first value; and a controller unit operativelycoupled to the non-transitory storage unit, and configured to: accessthe non-transitory storage unit; and determine a similar referencecondition to an initial patient condition in each of the plurality ofdentition categories by: comparing the initial patient condition in eachof the plurality of dentition categories with the one or more referenceconditions in each of the plurality of dentition categories, selectingat least one reference condition in one or more of the plurality ofdentition categories that is similar to the initial patient condition ina same dentition category, and generating a patient identifier matrixincluding a plurality of positions, wherein: each of the plurality ofpositions corresponds to one of the plurality of dentition categories;and each of the plurality of positions includes a second value equal tothe first value of the selected reference condition for thecorresponding one of the plurality of dentition categories.
 9. Thesystem of claim 8 wherein the plurality of dentition categories includeat least two of: sagittal, vertical, horizontal, arch length, or anumber of a tooth in a dentition of a patient.
 10. The system of claim8, wherein the controller unit is configured to output one or more of atreatment description, a treatment goal, a time to complete thetreatment, a difficulty level, or an example of the treatment option.11. The system of claim 8 wherein the controller unit is furtherconfigured to compare at least a portion of the patient identifier withone or more reference identifiers, wherein each of the one or morereference identifiers includes an initial reference dentition and afinal reference dentition, to select at least one reference identifierfrom the one or more reference identifiers, wherein the selectedreference identifier includes the portion of the patient identifier, andto determine a final patient dentition based on the final referencedentition corresponding to the selected reference identifier.
 12. Thesystem of claim 8 further including a terminal operatively coupled tothe controller unit, the terminal configured to transmit one or more ofthe initial patient condition.
 13. The system of claim 12 wherein theterminal is further configured to include a display unit.